|
Although this
does not directly address the issue of culture shock, it may help
you better understand the psychological implications and behaviors.
Abraham Maslow
(1954) attempted to synthesize a large body of research related
to human motivation. Prior to Maslow, researchers generally focused
separately on such factors as biology, achievement, or power to
explain what energizes, directs, and sustains human behavior. Maslow
posited a hierarchy
of human needs based on two groupings: deficiency needs and
growth needs. Within the deficiency needs, each lower need must
be met before moving to the next higher level. Once each of these
needs has been satisfied, if at some future time a deficiency is
detected, the individual will act to remove the deficiency. The
first four levels are:
1) Physiological:
hunger, thirst, bodily comforts, etc.;
2) Safety/security:
out of danger;
3) Belonginess
and Love: affiliate with others, be accepted; and
4) Esteem: to
achieve, be competent, gain approval and recognition.

According to
Maslow, an individual is ready to act upon the growth needs if and
only if the deficiency needs are met. Maslow's initial conceptualization
included only one growth need--self-actualization. Self-actualized
people are characterized by: 1) being problem-focused; 2) incorporating
an ongoing freshness of appreciation of life; 3) a concern about
personal growth; and 4) the ability to have peak experiences. Maslow
later differentiated
the growth need of self-actualization, specifically naming two
lower-level growth needs prior to general level of self-actualization
(Maslow & Lowery, 1998) and one beyond that level (Maslow, 1971).
They are:
5) Cognitive:
to know, to understand, and explore;
6) Aesthetic:
symmetry, order, and beauty;
7) Self-actualization:
to find self-fulfillment and realize one's potential; and
8) Transcendence:
to help others find self-fulfillment and realize their potential.
Maslow's basic
position is that as one becomes more self-actualized
and transcendent, one becomes more wise (develops wisdom) and
automatically knows what to do in a wide variety of situations.
Maslow published
his first conceptualization of his theory over 50 years ago (Maslow,
1943) and it has since become one of the most popular and often
cited theories of human motivation. An interesting phenomenon related
to Maslow's work is that in spite of a lack of evidence to support
his hierarchy, it enjoys wide acceptance (Wahba & Bridgewell,
1976; Soper, Milford & Rosenthal, 1995).
The few major
studies that have been completed on the hierarchy seem to support
the proposals of William James (1892/1962) and Mathes (1981) that
there are only three levels of human needs. James hypothesized the
levels of material (physiological, safety), social (belongingness,
esteem), and spiritual.
Mathes' three levels were physiological, belonginess, and self-actualization;
he considered security and self-esteem as unwarranted. Alderfer
(1972) developed a comparable hierarchy with his ERG (existence,
relatedness, and growth) theory. His approach modified Maslow's
theory based on the work of Gordon Allport (1960, 1961) who incorporated
concepts from systems
theory into his work on personality.
Alderfer's
Hierarchy of Motivational Needs
|
Level
of Need
|
Definition
|
Properties
|
|
Existence
|
Includes
all of the various forms of material and psychological desires |
When
divided among people one person's gain is another's loss if
resources are limited |
|
Relatedness
|
Involve
relationships with significant others |
Satisfied
by mutually sharing thoughts and feelings; acceptance, confirmation,
understanding and influence are elements |
|
Growth
|
Impel
a person to make creative or productive effects on himself and
his environment |
Satisifed
through using capabilities in engaging problems; creates a greater
sense of wholeness and fullness as a human being |
Maslow recognized that not all personalities followed his proposed
hierarchy. While a variety of personality dimensions might be considered
as related to motivational needs, one of the most often cited is
that of introversion and extroversion. Reorganizing Maslow's hierarchy
based on the work of Alderfer and considering the introversion/extraversion
dimension of personality results in three levels, each with an introverted
and extroverted component. This organization suggests there may
be two aspects of each level that differentiate how people relate
to each set of needs. Different personalities might relate more
to one dimension than the other. For example, an introvert at the
level of Other/Relatedness might be more concerned with his or her
own perceptions of being included in a group, whereas an extrovert
at that same level would pay more attention to how others value
that membership.
A
Reorganization of Maslow's and Alderfer's Hierarchies
|
Level
|
Introversion
|
Extroversion
|
|
Self
(Existence)
|
Physiological,
biological (including basic emotional needs) |
Connectedness,
security |
|
Other
(Relatedness)
|
Personal
identification with group, significant others (belongingness) |
Value
of person by group (esteem) |
|
Growth
|
Self-Actualization
(development of competencies [knowledge, attitudes and skills]
and character) |
Transcendence
(assisting in the development of others' competencies and character;
relationships to the unknown, unknowable) |
At this point there is little agreement about the identification
of basic
human needs and how they are ordered. For example, Deci and
Ryan (1991) also suggest three needs, although they are not necessarily
ordered: the need for autonomy, the need for competence, and the
need for relatedness. Franken (1994) suggests this lack of accord
may be a result of different philosophies of researchers rather
than differences among human beings. In addition, he reviews research
that shows a person's explanatory style will modify the list of
basic needs. Therefore, it seems appropriate to ask people what
they want and how their needs could be met rather than relying on
an unsupported theory. There is much work still to be done in this
area before we can rely on a theory to be more informative than
simply collecting and analyzing data. However, this body of research
can be very important to parents, educators, administrators and
others concerned with developing and using human potential. It provides
an outline of some important issues that must be addressed if human
beings are to achieve the levels of character and competencies necessary
to be successful in the information age.
References
Alderfer, C.
(1972). Existence, relatedness, & growth. New York: Free Press.
Allport, G. (1960). Personality and social encounter: Selected essays.
New York: Beacon Press.
Allport, G. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1991). A motivational approach to self:
Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Perspectives
on motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University
of Nebraska Press.
Franken, R. (1994). Human motivation. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
James, W. (1892/1962). Psychology: Briefer course. New York: Collier.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review,
50, 370-396.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York:
The Viking Press.
Maslow, A., & Lowery, R. (Ed.). (1998). Toward a psychology
of being (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.
Mathes, E. (1981, Fall). Maslow's hierarchy of needs as a guide
for living. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 21, 69-72.
Soper, B., Milford, G., & Rosenthal, G. (1995). Belief when
evidence does not support theory. Psychology & Marketing, 12(5),
415-422.
Wahba, A., & Bridgewell, L. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review
of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior
and Human Performance, 15, 212-240.
|